Bank/Thrift Supervision   |    Capital    |    CFPB    |    Deposit Insurance    |    Interchange    |    Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors   |    OCC-OTS Merger   |    Preemption    |    QM - QRM    |    Swaps   |    Volcker Rule    |    Full Topics List
Qualified Mortgage - Qualified Residential Mortgage
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - CFPB
Bank/Thrift Holding Company Supervision
Deposit Insurance
Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors
OCC-OTS Merger
Volcker Rule
Corporate Governance
Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC)
Office of Financial Research (OFR)
Systemic Risk
Supervision and Oversight
Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Prudential Supervision
Trust & Securities
Asset-Backed Securities
Resolution Authority

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

ABA, Groups Suggest Alternative for Privacy Notice

The CFPB’s proposal to simplify the annual privacy notice requirement under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act would fail to accomplish its goal, ABA and several trade groups said. They urged the bureau to consider an alternative approach that would eliminate the annual mailed notice requirement for institutions that have not changed their privacy practices and do not share information under the GLBA in a way that gives customers a right to opt out — a simple approach compatible with pending legislation in Congress.

The CFPB’s proposal creates an option “so circumscribed that it has very little practical value to consumers or financial service providers,” the groups said. Under the proposal, an institution may forgo mailing the annual privacy notice only if the terms have not changed since the previous notice, if it does not share the customer’s personal information in a way that triggers opt-out rights and if the bank uses the federal agencies’ model privacy notice form.

Banks would be required to post their privacy notices online in a continuously accessible place, offer a toll-free number customers can use to request a mailed copy of the notice and notify customers in other required notices where to find it, that it has not changed, and that it will be promptly mailed upon request. The groups said:
[This] requirement to provide a notice about the notice merely substitutes a new burden for the existing burden. [M]any of our members believe that the risks associated with the proposal make it unlikely it will be useful or used. With some adjustments, however, the bureau’s goals can be achieved.

Read the letter.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please read our comment policy before making a comment.