Bank/Thrift Supervision   |    Capital    |    CFPB    |    Deposit Insurance    |    Interchange    |    Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors   |    OCC-OTS Merger   |    Preemption    |    QM - QRM    |    Swaps   |    Volcker Rule    |    Full Topics List
Qualified Mortgage - Qualified Residential Mortgage
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - CFPB
Bank/Thrift Holding Company Supervision
Deposit Insurance
Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors
OCC-OTS Merger
Volcker Rule
Corporate Governance
Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC)
Office of Financial Research (OFR)
Systemic Risk
Supervision and Oversight
Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Prudential Supervision
Trust & Securities
Asset-Backed Securities
Resolution Authority

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

ABA Op-Ed: Regulators Must Clarify Role of Risk-Sensitive Models

Regulators must better clarify their expectations for risk-sensitive models used to determine regulatory capital levels for the largest banks, ABA VP Hugh Carney wrote in an American Banker op-ed. Recently, he wrote, regulators have begun to place greater emphasis on simpler, across-the-board capital standards – regardless of asset risk – rather than the risk-based models outlined under Basel II’s advanced approaches. This shift in thinking has led many banks to question the relevancy of their risk-based models and created uncertainties about how much money and resources should be devoted to them.

Carney wrote:
Policymakers are emphasizing simplicity without clarifying for banks the extent to which their risk-sensitive models – which they have spent tremendous resources to construct – still matter. A clearer understanding of risk management expectations is vitally important if regulators shift away from a risk-sensitive capital framework.

Under Basel’s advanced approaches, banks are allowed to align capital levels with their specific level of risk, a model that is “extremely useful in terms of risk management.” However, since the financial crisis, calls have increased for more standardized, risk-blind leverage ratios, leaving bankers confused over how to best balance regulatory expectations. Should regulators ultimately decide to move to a standard approach, Carney pointed out that it could lead to a repurposing of resources and key personnel, as well as the abandonment of models and programs that cost millions to develop.

Read more.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please read our comment policy before making a comment.