Tabs

Bank/Thrift Supervision   |    Capital    |    CFPB    |    Deposit Insurance    |    Interchange    |    Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors   |    OCC-OTS Merger   |    Preemption    |    QM - QRM    |    Swaps   |    Volcker Rule    |    Full Topics List
 
Qualified Mortgage - Qualified Residential Mortgage
Swaps
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - CFPB
Bank/Thrift Holding Company Supervision
Capital
Deposit Insurance
Interchange
Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors
OCC-OTS Merger
Preemption
Volcker Rule
Corporate Governance
Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC)
Appraisals
Office of Financial Research (OFR)
Systemic Risk
Supervision and Oversight
Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Prudential Supervision
Trust & Securities
Asset-Backed Securities
Resolution Authority

Friday, April 22, 2016

Bill Introduced to Address Effects of Fed Dividend Cut

Reps. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas) and Pete Sessions (R-Texas) introduced ABA-advocated legislation (H.R. 5027) that would alter the formula for capital that Federal Reserve member banks must hold with their regional Fed bank, potentially freeing up billions in “dead capital.”

Currently, Fed member banks must pay in 3% of capital to the Fed and hold another 3% at their institution, subject to call. In return, the Fed pays banks with less than $10 billion in assets a 6% dividend on their paid-in capital, while paying larger banks a lesser floating rate, currently pegged at 2.21%.

Until last December, the dividend rate for all banks was the same. But Congress, despite strenuous objections from the banking industry, reduced the dividend for larger banks in order to pay for costs in the highway spending bill.

H.R. 5027 seeks to address the negative effects of this change by letting banks put more of their required capital to work. It would allow large banks to pay in just 0.5% percent and retain 5.5% of their required capital, subjecting the retained capital to call only after the Fed exhausts its $10 billion capital surplus account. Banks under $10 billion in assets could elect this same treatment, still earning 6% on their paid-in capital, or maintain the status quo.

Rep Neugebauer said
As a result of this dividend reduction, banks experienced an artificial reduction in their return on investment – in essence, a bank tax. At a time when our economy continues to see tepid growth, it only makes sense to free up capital and allow it to be put to its most efficient use.
ABA EVP James Ballentine said
The precipitous change in the Fed dividend policy last year was made with no hearings or consideration for its impact on banks and their communities. H.R. 5027 offers a commonsense solution that can turn billions in dead capital into loans and other productive uses.
Read more.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please read our comment policy before making a comment.