Over the past two years, the committee has issued more than a dozen new regulatory capital proposals in a bid to simplify. The proposals were released in a piecemeal fashion, with each new proposal seemingly unrelated to the previous one.
He added that this lack of cohesion has made it difficult for banks of all sizes to provide appropriate feedback.
Currently, the nation’s largest banks are responsible for monitoring more than a dozen regulatory capital measures and undergoing extensive annual stress testing. As the Basel Committee continues to work toward streamlining these standards, Carney recommended that U.S. regulators seek broader engagement on the issue through an advance notice of proposed rulemaking, which would allow the public, Congress and the industry an opportunity to provide insight into what modifications should be made.
Whatever options U.S. regulators are considering to simplify the standards, it is essential that they engage the public, Congress and industry in the discussion. This would allow the public to weigh in on crucial questions… including whether agencies are striking the right balance between risk sensitivity and simplicity, whether simplification is being done in a capital-neutral manner, whether the U.S. approach is consistent with Basel and how community banks will be affected.