Tabs

Bank/Thrift Supervision   |    Capital    |    CFPB    |    Deposit Insurance    |    Interchange    |    Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors   |    OCC-OTS Merger   |    Preemption    |    QM - QRM    |    Swaps   |    Volcker Rule    |    Full Topics List
 
Qualified Mortgage - Qualified Residential Mortgage
Swaps
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - CFPB
Bank/Thrift Holding Company Supervision
Capital
Deposit Insurance
Interchange
Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors
OCC-OTS Merger
Preemption
Volcker Rule
Corporate Governance
Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC)
Appraisals
Office of Financial Research (OFR)
Systemic Risk
Supervision and Oversight
Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Prudential Supervision
Trust & Securities
Asset-Backed Securities
Resolution Authority

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

DOJ Reverses Position on CFPB Structure in Amicus Brief

In an amicus brief filed in the case of PHH Mortgage v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Department of Justice reversed its position on the constitutionality of the CFPB’s structure, asserting that the Bureau’s structure with a single director removable only “for cause” should be invalidated.

This anticipated move by the Trump administration is the latest development in this closely watched case, which arose in 2015, when Cordray overruled an administrative law judge’s recommendation for a $6.5 million fine against mortgage lender PHH for allegedly requiring unlawful kickbacks from mortgage insurers in violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

Last month, the full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to hear the case, vacating an earlier ruling by a three-judge D.C. Circuit panel finding the structure unconstitutional and allowing the director’s removal not just “for cause” but at the president’s discretion – thus preventing President Trump from removing current director Richard Cordray before his term expires in 2018. Oral arguments in the “en banc” review of the case will be heard by the D.C. Circuit on May 24. ABA will continue to monitor the case as it progresses.

Read the amicus brief.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please read our comment policy before making a comment.