Bank/Thrift Supervision   |    Capital    |    CFPB    |    Deposit Insurance    |    Interchange    |    Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors   |    OCC-OTS Merger   |    Preemption    |    QM - QRM    |    Swaps   |    Volcker Rule    |    Full Topics List
Qualified Mortgage - Qualified Residential Mortgage
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - CFPB
Bank/Thrift Holding Company Supervision
Deposit Insurance
Mortgage Finance
Municipal Advisors
OCC-OTS Merger
Volcker Rule
Corporate Governance
Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC)
Office of Financial Research (OFR)
Systemic Risk
Supervision and Oversight
Payment, Clearing and Settlement
Prudential Supervision
Trust & Securities
Asset-Backed Securities
Resolution Authority

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

ABA to CFPB: Objective Definition of ‘Prepaid Account’ Is Necessary

Noting that numerous compliance challenges remain, ABA welcomed the CFPB’s proposal to delay the implementation of its final rule on prepaid products for six months. The proposal would delay the compliance date to April 1, 2018.

However, ABA warned that the rule still requires significant adjustment to ensure banks can confidently offer checking and prepaid accounts without liability risk. ABA urged the bureau to adopt a more objective definition of “prepaid account” as any product marketed or labeled as a prepaid account or card, rather than the more subjective approach of saying it “is not a checking account, share draft account or [NOW] account.”

ABA said:
Absent a usable distinction, banks face unfair and significant compliance risk and liability for inadvertent violations if an examiner or plaintiffs’ lawyer asserts that the bank’s checking account should be treated as a prepaid account and subject to the related disclosures and restrictions of the rule.
ABA added that greater specificity would provide greater protection from civil liability.

ABA also noted that the lack of specificity in the final rule calls into question whether “model safe accounts,” which the bureau encourages banks to offer and which lack a paper check feature, are covered by the prepaid final rule. This regulatory ambiguity could discourage banks from offering these checkless checking accounts and inhibit further innovation in financial services for the underbanked.

Read the letter.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please read our comment policy before making a comment.